Scum at the Top header

Archives | Choice Links

Archives 29 August-04 September 2004

Saturday, 4 September 2004 - Oz at the Crossroads, Day 6
Re-election Of Bush Promises Hell On Earth

It is unbelievable, but the maxim born in Biblical times: "he who lives by the sword, dies by the sword," applies to the early years of the 21st century.

And the perpetrators of this return to hell on earth? The likes of George W. Bush, Ariel Sharon, Vladimir Putin, and their deputies, Tony Blair, and John Howard. Their militant, almost alien, ignorance of their species is the cause and terrorism is the effect. More...

separator

Thursday, 2 September 2004 - Oz at the Crossroads, Day 4
A Utopian Image The Right Wing Hates
Multicultural students
Noble Park Secondary College students from many backgrounds discuss racial tolerance and prejudice. They are, from left, Nathan Pham (Vietnamese), Amel Masinovic (Bosnian), Shekib Osmaney (Afghan), Kendra Keleher (Aboriginal-African), Amela Srebric (Bosnian), Eren Akyalcin (Turkish), Teresa Garang (Sudanese), Samantha Bagley (Irish-British-American) and Marta Vlad (Romanian). Picture: Nicole Emanuel

Larry Schwartz: Racial slurs 'justified as free speech'
Larry Schwartz: Taunts and bigotry do hurt, students admit

separator

Plague Of Stat Decs: Truth Meaninglessness Under Howard

The "lying rodent" affair has caused statutory declarations from both Russell Galt, who claims George Brandis used the sterling appellation, and George Brandis, who claims he didn't. Labor, however, claims that "even waiters in Canberra restaurants had heard Brandis say the Prime Minister was not believable in his denials about the children overboard.

Of tangential interest is the fact that George Brandis is not the only one to call Howard a rodent. Quite awhile ago, SCATT noted the shape of Howard's skull as resembling that very species. We called him a "rat-faced Calvinist" to be exact. And Dan McNutt of Crikey.com has called him "the rodent" for ever so long.

Meanwhile the Brandis in question has produced phone records showing that Mike Scrafton engaged in only two calls concerning the veracity of children overboard with John Howard, not the three he remembers. The two calls claimed by Brandis took 9 minutes 36 seconds and 51 seconds respectively. Presumably the ten or so minutes were spent discussing the video only? Scrafton earlier took a lie detector test on the content of the calls and passed with flying colours. But never mind that, the government is satisfied he is now thoroughly discredited.

Just a reminder how lowlifes are routinely let go on technicalities. No wonder since lowlifes Brandis, Howard himself, and just about every Illiberal parliamentarian are lawyers by dubious trade
 --HH

LATE BREAKING NEWS: Brandis really did call Howard a rodent. Nevertheless, the Illiberal Party is ready to expel Brandis' accuser: Brandis accuser braced for possible expulsion. What kind of sad sack would vote for these used car QCs!

separator

Wednesday, 1 September 2004 - Oz at the Crossroads, Day 3
What Kind Of Country Is This?

Let's see now, first there was

The Invasion, in which a few Sons of Empire offloaded a bunch of misérables.

Then, because even the crims were white and British, we got to

Slaughter the Aboriginals, who, in our enlightened estimation, were far more terrifying than the other equally strange fauna and flora.

Then, civilised to the core, we established

White Australia, excluding, to our cigar-chomping satisfaction, all other coloured races, except for use as servants and sexual playthings.

Then, remembering we were Christian, we acted from sheer benevolence to

Remove the children from the remaining Aborigines with the intent to breed out their ungodly colour and make them love Jesus like we did.

Not content to vastly improve the lives of these children, while allowing their parents more leisure time for grog, we joined forces, one and all, to

Exert our manly power over some 500,000 other children who were orphaned for one reason or another.

Hey, no wonder

John Howard is our Prime Minister. --HH

LINKS:
Senator Andrew Murray: Half a Million Need 39 Steps to Justice
Richard Yallop: The children nobody loved
Jeremy Roberts: Scarred for life by the sisters of little mercy
David Wroe: Abused children's report draws tears

separator

Maurie Gee: Trusting John Howard
(Courtesy: Maurie Gee)

separator

Tuesday, 31 August 2004 - Oz at the Crossroads, Day 2
Where's Me Tablets!
by Gort Slypesunder
Who Let The Dog Out?

Trish Worth is not your typical Illiberal Party politician. By that I mean she doesn't normally go out of her way to appear subhuman. Yet, despite John Howard's assurances of her compassion, she is still just that far removed from real life that she can equate animals with refugees.

Yes, I know, she didn't exactly mean that asylum seekers were on the level of cats and dogs, but shucks folks, that's how it sounds. Later, in trying to extricate herself she confounded the gaffe by referring to her sort of privileged friends who, when being posted overseas, hoped and prayed the posting would be to a country that made it easy to take their pets. This, she said, should explain her position. But her position is as a member of a government who does not extend that hope for human beings in leaky boats.

Alas, real life and its real suffering is unknown to Illiberals.

separator

Someone Should Put This Dog To Sleep

Last month the War chimp declared he was the Peace Turkey. Just like that, George W. Bush went from pride at murder and destruction in the name of Halliburton to pride as a man of peace...in the name of Halliburton.

Now he's suddenly declared he can't win the war on terrorism. Hey, every wide-awake-for-a-second Umeruhcan will now believe that was always the case. John Edwards, Democrat vice-presidential candidate said:

"After months of listening to the Republicans base their campaign on their singular ability to win the war on terror, the president now says we can't win the war on terrorism."

It's amazing how similar Bush and Howard are. And how stupid they think their countrymen are. Trouble is, they're right.

separator

Wilcox: For my latest creation
(Courtesy: Cathy Wilcox, Sydney Morning Herald)

separator

Gaggin' The Maggot
by Jerzy Wiçiçiwiç

Tim Colebatch in The Age Let's see policies, not scare tactics, quotes our Prime Menteur on interest rates under Labor:

"If interest rates . . . were to rise to the average of what they were under previous Labor governments, that would add an additional $960 a month to the average mortgage of the average Australian family."

In yesterday's SMH article, Peter Hartcher turned this back on Howard:

To arrive at this figure, Howard applied Keating government interest rates to a Latham government. To do the same to the Liberals would be to apply Fraser rates to a Howard Government - and that implies Howard would increase mortgage payments by $621 a month.

Colebatch continues:

If this drivel is the level of economic debate at the start of the election campaign, God knows where we will be by the end of it. It is inaccurate as history, ridiculous as economic analysis, and offers backward-looking smears instead of forward-looking policy.

Colebatch then takes him to task for allowing the foreign debt to double from $193 billion when he took office to the current $393 billion, but somehow not mentioning it.

separator

It's not exactly manna from heaven, but it's from the next best place, the United States:

[Richard Clarke] told the ABC's Lateline program that having one party that favours the withdrawal of troops may make Australia a more attractive target.

"I think it opens the possibility of some terrorist group related to Al Qaeda wanting to do something which otherwise wouldn't be the case in an Australian election," he said.

"So oddly enough, I'm saying I don't think Al Qaeda will try to affect the US election, but because the Australian election is so similar to what happened in Spain, I would think the possibility does exist here."

Now this is the same Richard Clarke who broke ranks with the Bush Administration earlier this year on the inefficacy of the Iraq invasion in regards to the war on terror. Our John would have hated him for that.

But this will be music to Puny Nephew's ears. Richard Clarke will suddenly be a man of great vision. Because a terrorist attack of whatever magnitude will insure that Howard's born yesterday supporters will return him to power.

Call me a clapped out nihilist, but I just don't believe Australians have the maturity of the Spanish to see through the bullshit. Terrorists take note. An attack here will backfire.

separator

SCATT subscriber P.S. says one of the things that stuck out in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 was the meeting at the Ritz Hotel in Washington with delegates from the Carlyle Group. P.S. wonders, "didn't John Howard stay at that hotel and what was the meeting he attended on 9/11? Kind of important since that company gained substantial contracts from Iraq."

We'll never know and L'il Dubya won't either, because like most sleeper agents for foreign powers, that part of his "mind" self-locks when it comes to the ways and means of selling out his country for cuddles from Big Dubya and a place in the record books.

separator

Speaking of record books, Phillip Adams writes in today's OZ on the terrifying aspect of a Bush re-election. Of Howard's, he says:

Howard is first, foremost and finally a political survivor who wants to win elections - and to notch up some record scores like his hero Don Bradman. He'll do or say anything to that end. But our PM's never been driven by any emotion larger than vengeance (he's eliminated most traces of the hated Keating) or any idea bigger than the GST.

separator

Monday, 30 August 2004 - Oz at the Crossroads, Day 1
Mother Of All Scare Campaigns

John Howard has come out like a hissing possum at midnight. Every sibilant word is being shoved down our throats to make us tremble with fear at the hordes in the Labor Party. The Gospel according to John is that the Labor Party represents all the evils known to man and that if we cherish the blue rinse in our hair we had better re-elect him or suffer the direst of consequences.

Interest rates of course are not only going to go up under Labor, they are going to send our mortgages sky high:

[Howard] emphasised his record as a sound economic manager and launched into blatant scaremongering about the consequences of a Mark Latham prime ministership.

Zeroing in on the most electorally tender economic issue in the mortgage-laden marginal seats, he implied that a Latham government would add $960 a month to repayments on an average new mortgage - an increase of 80 per cent.

This incendiary claim, however, ignores Labor policy, and depends on invalid assumptions.

To arrive at this figure, Howard applied Keating government interest rates to a Latham government. To do the same to the Liberals would be to apply Fraser rates to a Howard Government - and that implies Howard would increase mortgage payments by $621 a month.

Latham immediately tagged Howard's claim as "one of the great furphies of this campaign."

People on the street know interest rates are going up after the election--the Reserve Bank admitted this was the case a few weeks ago--no matter who wins.

Standard & Poors, the little economic-ratings agency in Washington that controls the well-being of every nation, said Labor was no threat to Australia's rating and that they didn't believe in "one party good, one party bad".

Beyond that, "economic experts" across the board agree that Howard's scare campaign is foolish to the point of potentially biting him on his spotty arse, many pointing to the stability of all state Labor governments.

Further, John Howard is yelling about Labor's heretofore abscence of policies on the table, forgetting, or hoping that the electorate will forget, that in the campaign of 1996, he refused to table one stinking policy.

And of course the unions are going to take over if Labor gets in. To John Howard unions should not even exist. They simply get in the way of the unfettered employee abuse all business lusts for. What a shame that Labor has never had the guts to make the same complaints about the extent to which big business owns the Illiberal Party. But they can't, which shows how strong is the control business has over every political party in every nation.

With John Howard frothing like a mad dog on the very first day of this six week campaign, it hardly seems worthwhile to even comment. The old fart is obviously unfit to govern. Beyond that, what's to say? Nothing serious, that's for sure. There is nothing left but to make fun of him.
 --HH

separator

From John Howard's Diary

If John Howard were still alive, he might be writing stuff like below. But he's just an animated figure who escaped from Vincent Price's House of Wax in the fifties. --HH

So I finally called the election today. Man, Democracy is such a hassle, it'd be so much easier if I could just be PM for ever and ever. Elections are so much work, too - kissing babies, making speeches, pretending you care about people and stuff.

Shut up, Mike Scrafton. Children Overboard is sooo 2001. Like, I tell so many lies, as if I'm supposed to remember the details of just one lie that happened years ago. And now Labor are saying that I've lied 27 times, which is such crap. I've lied way more times than that. I mean, I lie at least once a day, and that's usually just when Alex Downer asks, "Does my bum look big in this?" Credit where credit's due, please.

John Howard: P.M.

separator

Lunatics in High Places

In case you missed it, here are a couple of salient points from Alistair Mant's Sunday Age article: Between fear and hope:

The chatter in Washington is that Bush is a "borderline" personality-disorder type, exacerbated by the fact that he went cold turkey at the age of 40 without passing through Alcoholics Anonymous' 12-point recovery program. This, it is argued, leaves him as a "dry drunk" prone to other addictions - such as fundamentalist religion.

In Britain, the Prime Minister's increasingly messianic tone worries observers. The distinguished Times columnist (and ex-MP) Matthew Parris even wrote an extraordinary article entitled 'Are we witnessing the madness of Tony Blair?' - arguing that his simple-minded conviction over Iraq was cause for serious concern. "Great leaders," he wrote, "share with great confidence tricksters a capacity to be more than persuaded, but inhabited, by their cause. Almost inevitably, an inspirational leader spends important parts of his life certain of the uncertain, convinced of the undemonstrable. So do the mentally ill!"

Mant doesn't exactly psychologise Our Johnny, but it's safe to say for starters that Howard is a psychopathic liar with a distinct megalomania. No one ever thought they would have to deal with...the Suburban Messiah! --HH

Alistair Mant: Between fear and hope

separator

Sunday, 29 August 2004
Weasel Of Oz Calls 9 October Election

"Yesterday both sides of politics waited on tenterhooks for [Howard's] decision on what he thinks is in his best interests." Thus spake Michelle Grattan in todays Sunday Age. In fact he no longer had any best interests, having painted himself into a corner with the release of the Powell-Noonan story on what he knew about the truth of children overboard at the time. He didn't expect them to corroborate Mike Scrafton's version of events. But he'd already told a Hobart radio host he was going to Canberra over the weekend and not Kirribilli. He must have been so sure that the generals would come down on his side.

In his election-opening speech Howard has shown real chutzpah by saying, "This election, ladies and gentlemen, will be about trust". Latham's reply reinvoked his ladder of opportunity mantra a tad ad nauseum, but also hammered on about truth in government.

So here we go in the greatest crossroads election in Australia's history. Latham should be the equivalent of Bill Hayden's drovers dog. We'll know in six weeks.

For an interesting analysis on what kind of an election we are having, see below.
 --HH
Alistair Mant: Between fear and hope

separator

Top

Archives | Choice Links

SCUM AT THE TOP is not copyrighted and may be used in whole or in part for any purpose the reader chooses.
Published in Melbourne, Australia by the Political Prisoners of the Future.